Click covers for info. Copyright (C) Rudy Rucker 2021.


Archive for the ‘Rudy’s Blog’ Category

Shuzan's Koan of the Shippe or Staff

Monday, October 10th, 2005

Hey, I'll be reading a story on KFJC bright and early Tuesday morning again.

'GigaDial



Yesterday I mentioned using a koan in an SF story as a way of jumping between the material and aethereal layers of reality. Shuzan's koan of the shippe (short bamboo staff) seems like a good one to use. I looked for it online and first found this form.

(Form 1) Shuzan held out his short staff and said, “If you call this a short staff, you oppose its reality. If you do not call it a short staff, you ignore the fact. Now what do you wish to call this?” [Text found in an online koan collection.]

Note that in traditional Zen teaching, the penalty for a poor answer was a hard whack on the head with a short bamboo staff like Shuzan held.

The commentary on this koan says, “It cannot be expressed with words and it cannot be expressed without words. Now say quickly what it is.”

All the other online refs quote the same text — a weakness of online info. So I went the dead-tree route. D. T. Suzuki describes some variations on this koan in Essays in Zen Buddhism (1961 Grove Press, NY) which sits on my bookcase.

[The Suzuki picture is from a cool Neobuddhism site.]

(Form 2) The masters generally go about with a kind of short [bamboo] stick known as a shippe, or at least they did so in old China. It does not matter whether it is a shippe or not; anything, in fact will answer our purpose. Shuzan, a noted Zen master of the tenth century, held out his stick and said to a group of his disciples: “Call it not a shippe; if you do, you assert. Nor do you deny its being a shippe; if you do, you negate. Apart from affirmation and negation, speak, speak!” Suzuki, p, 275.

(Form 3) Ummon expressed the same idea with his staff, which he held up, saying: “What is this? If you say it is a staff, you go right to hell; but it is not a staff, what is it?” Suzuki, p. 276.

(Form 4) Ummon once lifted his staff before a congregation and remarked: “In the scriptures we read that the ignorant take this for a real thing, the Hinayanists resolve it into a nonentity, the Pratyekabuddhas regard it as a hallucination, while the Bodhisattvas admit its apparent reality, which is, however, essentially empty. But, monks, you simply call it a staff when you see one. Walk or sit as you will, but do not stand irresolute.” Suzuki, p. 34.

Timing Channel Attack on the Computational Ultrastructure of Spacetime

Sunday, October 9th, 2005

[This somewhat disturbing picture is from an ad for the Chukchansi gambling resort in today's San Jose Sunday paper. The rest of today's pix are recycled from the blog image bank. If you're really curious about a picture, right click on it to get a context menu and select Properties to get a window containing the name of the file. In some browsers, the Properties window will be too small to show the whole file name, in that case, you can click inside the filename and arrow-key to the right. Once you have the name of the *.JPG file, copy the name. It's likely to work better if you don't include the path, and you don't need the “.jpg,” you can just double click on the name itelf to select it. And then you paste the name into the blog Search box in the sidebar on my blog page. In Windows, of course, you can use Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V for copy and paste, with the Mac you use the Apple key instead of Ctrl. Once you copy the picture name into the Search box and press the Go button by the Search box, you get a page with clickable titles of all the entries where the photo in question appears — normally you want to click the last and oldest entry to discover the picture's origin. It would be nice to have PHP code to do this automatically, that is, find previous appearances of a given picture. I'm inching towards the Complete Lifebox Platform, here.]

I got intrigued by this thing Charles Stross mentions in my favorite recent SF novel Accelerando. He talks about an “…alien superpower – maybe a collective of Kardashev Type Three galaxy-spanning civilizations – running a timing channel attack on the computational ultrastructure of spacetime itself, trying to break through to whatever's underneath … [yes,] something vast – a timing channel attack on the virtual machine that's running the universe, perhaps, or an embedded simulation of an entirely different universe.”

What the f*ck is a timing channel attack? It sounds great, Charlie just says it, and we feel like it means something even before we know any details.

Searching the web, I find that a timing channel attack is a type of side channel attack, which is any attack that uses something other than purely abstract software analysis, it gets actual physical data about the encryption process, like it measures how long the machine takes to encrypt something, or listens to its sound, or watches its power consumption or RAM use. The idea is that, e.g. if I eavesdrop and see a lot of y get coded into y^x MOD n, and n is known as well, then I can guess the bits of x one by one from the timing info because the “0” bits of the exponent use less computing time than “1” bits.

So in my story, some people are doing a side channel attack to figure out the ultimate reality program. Or they use the channel attack info to go to the deeper reality. Or both. They’re called reality hackers, natch, just like the old Mondoid phrase.

Suppose some diaphanous alien spirit-creatures have to check in and out to travel back and forth between here and the other, realer, subworld — call it the subfab.

Suppose I am able to monitor the — call them silfs — going from here over to the subfab. I can time, let us say, the interval between the silf saying “Go” and the silf wavering and disappearing. The silfs are being encrypted and I can see how long the encryption time takes. Problem here is that the data in a silf is so big and gnarly, so it’s hard to write it in binary and get the timing per 0/1 bit tested. Of course with the arphidnet mind, this would in fact be feasible.

Encryption isn’t an obviously relevant notion for exploring the computational ultrastructure of spacetime, and still less does it open an obvious travel route to the world’s deeper levels. How could the side channel attack give you information about the structure of the subfab? How could it help you get there?

Suppose you slavishly encrypt your body just like a silf does and then hope that it simply happens that you’ll then trickle down into some cracky-crack of spacetime. We won’t do this so crudely, though, we won’t turn ourselves into, like, radio waves as they did in The Fly. What we’re gonna to is quantum-tunnel from a material body to an aethereal body.

Suitably encrypted data slides through the grill between worlds on its own. Like a beetle walking over a grating in such a way that it doesn’t step on any of the separators. A thin man dropping between the bars of a curbside sewer drain. Yes.

Transforming or encrypting yourself with the silfs’ process gives you an “aethereal body” which is, let us say, a congeries of subtle dark energy vortices. Catch: due to the quantum mechanical no-cloning theorem, you can have a material body or an aethereal body, but not both at the same time. So the first person who encrypts into aethereal form is taking a big chance.

A key element in the process is the quantum mechanical notion that if nobody is watching something then it smears out into a superposed state. Let’s suppose that for a silf to travel between our universe to the subfab (1) she superposes herself, turns off self-observation and spreads out into an indeterminate state, and then (2) observes herself in such a way so as to collapse into the aethereal or material form.

The observation method is the encryption method. A certain quantum-mechanical operator. It takes the form of a koan-style question. “A flag is flapping. What is moving: wind or flag?”

As well as the koan, the material/aethereal transformation routine embodies a mantra, an information pattern which is, in effect, a code number.

Quantum meditation.

Our universe and the subfab are overlaid upon each other in the same space, separated by a tiny distance in the fourth dimension. In the aethereal form, this is the subfab; in the material form, this is the universe. You perceive the one that matches your body.

Your Gigasecond Birthday, Evolution and Alife Lecture Posted

Friday, October 7th, 2005

I had insomnia the other night after some clod (I think it was the automatic telemarketing machine of “Brian's Garden Services”) rang our phone at 1 AM and then I lay awake till 3 AM, and I started calculating how many seconds old I am, inspired by Charles Stross's computer-think gimmick of discussing periods of time in gigaseconds in Accelerando.

And I realized you have your gigasecond birthday — well really its billionth birthsecond — in your 31st year of life, and that before too many more years my two-billionth birthsecond will be rolling around.

Rudy, Jr., wrote a nice little web page that helps you compute your billionth birthsecond. If you're 30 or just turned 31, check this out so you don't let your gigabirthsecond slip by uncerebrated! This is a photo of Rudy taken precisely at his billionth birth second, by the way.

I recorded another lecture in my “Philosophy and Computers” class yesterday, about evolution and artificial life (a.k.a. alife). The picture above is from the amazing alife Galapagos program by the supernal Karl Sims.

The sound came out better than before, because reader Lisa Williams tipped me off about Audacity, which is free. This ware has a nice visual display so I can edit the files. And it has a very good feature “Equalization.” I'm loading the preset “Acoustic” equalization curve and applying it, which cleans up the sound a lot. And you can get a free plug-in so that Audacity saves WAV format into MP3.

'GigaDial

I posted the link to it on Gigadial as usual.

The demos are mostly from “Boppers”, which you can get with the “Software Downloads” button on my page for The Lifebox, The Seashell, and the Soul.

Apple, Journal of Unconventional Computing, Aaronson

Wednesday, October 5th, 2005

I went to have lunch at Apple yesterday. Their address is “1 Infinite Loop,” which seems cute, but the roadways by the entrance are set up so that if you make what looks like a natural turn for the parking lots, it whisks you onto northbound De Anza Boulevard and you have to make a difficult U-turn and two left turns to get back. Infinite loop indeed.

I got to have a special Apple badge. Somehow the high-voltage grills at the doors failed to detect that I’m a Windows programmer, and I escaped vaporization.

I was there to see my former students Leo Lee (right), and Alan Borecky (left). Alan works for Electronic Arts on the Tiger Woods golf games; he was just visiting like me. Leo recently started working at Apple on a project he wouldn’t tell me anything about. He’s enjoying himself.

On another note, computer visionary Rodney Berry tipped me off about this great new magazine, the International Journal of Unconventional Computing, about the generalized kinds of computations that I write about in my book The Lifebox, The Seashell, and the Soul. What makes this journal site really great is that all the papers are readable online! You can, like, find out about using Zhabotinsky scrolls as a computer.

Meanwhile the hen-and-chicks cacti are processing data in the computational fog. Which leads to quantum computing, which leads to way-out-there theorist Scott Aaronson, who’s just started a blog with a link to a mind-breaking, incomprehensible but somehow very interesting list of ten problems for quantum computing. SF writers can strip-mine this page for buzzwords.


Rudy's Blog is powered by WordPress