{"id":7919,"date":"2018-04-25T13:20:45","date_gmt":"2018-04-25T20:20:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/?p=7919"},"modified":"2018-04-26T14:20:56","modified_gmt":"2018-04-26T21:20:56","slug":"4dwhiteotherworlds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2018\/04\/25\/4dwhiteotherworlds\/","title":{"rendered":"Great Book on 4D. Christopher White, OTHER WORLDS!"},"content":{"rendered":"

For the last couple of months I\u2019ve been obsessively busy with finishing my novel Return to the Hollow Earth<\/em>\u2014which I\u2019ll discuss in a different post next week. Re. blogging, what with the rampaging ubiquity of social media, long-form blog posts are slippping in their popularity as a communication format. But there\u2019s no replacement for a meaty post when I\u2019ve got a lot of things to say and a lot of photos to show.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s topic is Other Worlds: Spirituality and the Searth for Invisible Dimensions<\/em>, by Christopher G. White (Harvard University Press 2018), available <\/a>in hardback or Kindle for about $35. I met Chris a couple of times while he was working on the book\u2014it took him a number of years. He\u2019s a professor of religion at Vassar, and a nice guy. I like his book exceedingly, and I wrote an official blurb for it.<\/p>\n

Other Worlds <\/em>is a magisterial and deeply satisfying work on the history of a peculiarly modern idea: the fourth dimension. This esoteric concept points beyond the quotidian world, and Christopher White\u2019s volume shows how readily the notion of hyperspace blends with human spiritual aspirations. The fun is that White makes his history into a juicy narrative, rife with geniuses, scientists, charlatans, impresarios, and artists of every stripe. The depth of research and wealth of information is stunning. One almost feels the author has surveyed our times with an all-seeing, higher-dimensional eye. A book to treasure, a feast.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In my post today, I\u2019ll present some excerpts from the book, along with a more or less random bunch of my recent photos.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The core 4D book that most people know about is Edwin Abbott Abbott\u2019s Flatland <\/em>of 1888. It\u2019s what we might now call a first-person science-fiction or fantasy novel, narrated by A Square, who lives on a plane called Flatland. A 3D sphere shows herself to our Square by passing through his plane, and then she lifts him out into \u201chigher space\u201d\u009d (that is, into three-dimensional space) and he looks down upon his world and sees…the insides of things. I kind of took off on this in my novel Spaceland<\/a><\/em>. <\/p>\n

Perhaps the fact that Abbott was a clergyman helped promote a movement to start thinking of the supernatural in terms of the fourth dimension\u2014and this is one of the key notions in White\u2019s book. The following quote, and all the others, are from his Other Worlds<\/em>.<\/p>\n

It was not that Abbott thought spirits existed in a higher, fourth dimension, though other Christians would make such arguments, as we will see. It was more that the overall aim of the Flatland narrative was to expand the imagination, to show that extra-empirical realms might exist. \u201cI hope,\u201d\u009d Abbott once commented about Flatland<\/em>, that it \u201cmay prove suggestive . . . to those Spacelanders of moderate and modest minds who\u2014speaking of that which is of the highest importance but lies beyond experience<\/em>\u2014decline to say on the one hand that \u201d\u02dcThis can never be,\u2019 and on the other hand, \u201d\u02dcIt must needs be precisely thus, and we know all about it.\u2019 \u201d\u009d Elsewhere he arrived at a similar formulation, saying that he hoped to help others \u201cconceive that there may be a Thoughtland, as much more real than Factland as the land of three dimensions seems to us more real than the land of two.\u201d\u009d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a countervailing notion of the fourth dimension, which even now we still see in Lovecraft\u2014the fourth dimension as a crazy, almost evil concept. I myself have taken some flak about this over the years. \u201cWon\u2019t the fourth dimension drive you crazy?\u201d\u009d White:<\/p>\n

Contemporary fiction also dealt at length with the idea that the fourth dimension could be an unhealthy obsession, though the topic was sometimes dealt with humorously. (One notice in Life Magazine <\/em>from 1912, for example, warned readers about professors who taught esoteric higher-dimensional notions that entangled one\u2019s mental faculties.) Though Howard Hinton denied that developing fourth-dimensional vision caused mental problems, he often encountered these criticisms. It did not help that there were widely publicized cases linking fourth-dimensional enthusiasms and mental illness, including one notice, picked up by a number of British newspapers, that an Oxford undergraduate and son of a local priest committed suicide after studying the fourth dimension. Newspapers reported his brother saying that the evening before the suicide the troubled undergraduate \u201cwished to discuss the \u201d\u02dcfourth dimension,\u2019 and higher mathematics. He was very excited. The next morning, he was very white, and his eyes were staring. He said he had been out of his mind, but was then sane, and that he knew it at that time, but might forget it.\u201d\u009d Did transcending normal perceptual abilities make one unfit for regular, three-dimensional life? <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The fourth dimension is of course invoked in the Minkowski-Einstein notion of spacetime, as used in the theory of Relativity. But it\u2019s not really time <\/em>that true aficionados of the fourth dimension are after. We want to think of a different space direction. So, yes, time is like a higher dimension, but we want four dimensions of actual space. This notion had early currency among physicists as well. White:<\/p>\n

While many mathematicians and scientists did not embrace the fourth dimension as a pathway to ecstatic religious visions the concept nevertheless did important imaginative work for them. Some, including the mathematical physicists James Clerk Maxwell and Peter Tait and the Canadian-American mathematician and astronomer Simon Newcomb, seemed to think that the fourth-dimension concept made the existence of heaven or a spirit world more plausible. In The Unseen Universe<\/em>, for example, Tait and his coauthor speculated that the soul was like a knotted vortex ring that came from an invisible dimension.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

One of my favorite writers on the fourth dimension is Charles Howard Hinton, indeed I once edited a book of his essays <\/a>and somewhat science-fictional stories. Hinton also appears as a character in my novel Jim and the Flims<\/a><\/em>. Here\u2019s White\u2019s very dramatic account of Hinton\u2019s death.<\/p>\n

On April 30, 1907, C. Howard Hinton and his wife Mary attended the annual dinner of the Society of Philanthropic Inquiry in Washington, D.C. Hinton did not know it, but it would be not just his last time socializing with friends but also his final exit from three-dimensional existence. The evening began auspiciously, with printed programs that featured Hinton\u2019s talk at the end of the night. When his turn came, Hinton stood up and gave what his wife remembered, writing in a sad letter to William James, as a \u201cwonderful speech.\u201d\u009d By the end of it, however, something was wrong. Hinton finished his remarks, walked out of the banquet, and fell to the ground dead. Hinton generally promised a lot, but that evening\u2019s remarks were particularly ambitious\u2014a brief talk, the program announced, on \u201cPsychic Entrance into Life in the Fourth Dimension or Heaven or any Other Place.\u201d\u009d On this occasion at least, Hinton succeeded in ways no one could have imagined.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In the early 1900s, numerous ministers began drawing on notion of the fourth dimension as a symbol or even an explanation of God, heaven, and the afterlife.<\/p>\n

There was nothing specifically Christian about higher-dimensional notions. In fact, most people who used higher dimensions did so not to buttress Christian doctrines but to argue for more general spiritual notions such as the existence of a spirit world, life after death, or transcendent intuitions and visions. Certain that modern people needed religious ideas even if they could not accept them on dogmatic authority, W. F. Tyler argued in a thoughtful book on The Dimensional Idea as an Aid to Religion <\/em>(1907) that the dimensional idea might \u201cbe grafted on to any existing religion,\u201d\u009d lifting all religious believers out of the \u201cquagmire\u201d\u009d of superstition and irrationality. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Russian mystic writer Pieter D. Ouspensky is another key figure in four-dimensional thought. I was a great student of his work when I was younger. White:<\/p>\n

In 1909 the Russian mystic and fourth-dimensional philosopher Pieter D. Ouspensky moved to St. Petersburg, where he held court at a bar called the Stray Dog, a seedy, foul-smelling, and badly lit bar where metaphysical seekers talked all night long. The Stray Dog crowd called him \u201cOuspensky Fourth Dimension\u201d\u009d and dancers, poets, painters, musicians, and radicals came to smoke, drink, and listen, day and night, as Ouspensky expounded with authority on the Tarot, yoga, \u201creality,\u201d\u009d time, consciousness, God, and higher dimensions. Even Leo Tolstoy listened patiently over lunch one day as Ouspensky drew multidimensional diagrams on the tablecloth. This metaphysical bar chatter was collected in Ouspensky\u2019s The Fourth Dimension <\/em>(1909) and Tertium Organum <\/em>(1911). As one who had experienced altered states of consciousness that were both frightening and revelatory, Ouspensky spoke with some authority. He studied James\u2019s Varieties of Religious Experience <\/em>and other books on consciousness, and he experimented with nitrous oxide and hashish. His experiences varied.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I well remember one of Ouspensky\u2019s essays on \u201cExperimental Mysticism.\u201d\u009d He talks about how after one of his \u201cexperiments.\u201d\u009d he awoke with the unpleasant sensation that everything was made of splintery, rough wood. Every pot-smoker knows this feeling all to well.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Claude Bragdon was another early favorite of mine. I studied his work while writing my very first book, Geometry, Relativity, and the Fourth Dimension<\/a>. <\/em>, which is still in print from Dover Books, having sold an astounding 200,000 copies. (I got $1000 for the rights back in 1976.) White: <\/p>\n

The Rochester architect Claude Bragdon believed that specific types of art and design could help people develop this kind of higher-dimensional sight. His pen and ink renderings, for instance, instead of using vanishing-point perspective, were isometric, employing a kind of perspective in which objects that are drawn seem to oscillate between different views. Isometric drawings oscillate in this way because parallel lines are drawn parallel on the page instead of receding in a triangle toward a vanishing point. There are a number of famous examples of isometric depth ambiguity, such as Escher\u2019s drawings [and the Necker Cube], which have unstable corners and thus cause the eye to move between different views. Bragdon used the technique because it put the viewer in simultaneous multiple positions vis-a-vis the drawing, forcing a kind of higher vision upon the viewer: The viewer saw different sides of a thing at once. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

And here\u2019s more:<\/p>\n

After 1919\u2026 Bragdon turned to the theater as a way to develop spiritual spaces and narratives. A Broadway actor, manager, and (later) film actor, Hampden asked Bragdon to be the artistic director of his production of Hamlet.
\nThis involved designing everything\u2014all the costumes, sets, stage elements, and lighting. The close friendship between the two turned into a successful collaboration, and by 1923 Bragdon had closed his architectural practice in Rochester and moved to New York City, where he became a full-time stage designer. He moved into the Shelton Hotel, sharing the building and often his breakfast table with Alfred Stieglitz, Georgia O\u2019Keeffe, and other likeminded artists, writers, and spiritual seekers. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

As I discuss in my book The Fourth Dimension<\/a><\/em>, that magic cupboard in C. S. Lewis\u2019s Narnia books is a magic door to another world. As it happens, the physicists have designed such a construct, a kind of tunnel that leads from one sheet of reality to the next\u2014it\u2019s called an Einstein-Rosen bridge.
\nReligion was another great interest of C. S. Lewis\u2019s, and here White discusses that.<\/p>\n

At some point Lewis annotated and underlined copies of Flatland <\/em>and Hinton\u2019s New Era of Thought<\/em>. At different times he spoke of Flatland <\/em>in particular as a modern classic\u2014\u201cthe original manuscript of the Iliad<\/em>,\u201d\u009d he once proclaimed, \u201ccould not be more precious.\u201d\u009d He used dimensional ideas to argue that nature was open and layered rather than closed and determined. In his book On Miracles<\/em>, for instance, he used dimensional ideas to argue that nature was \u201cperforated\u201d\u009d and \u201cpock-marked\u201d\u009d rather than closed, as logical positivists and scientific materialists insisted. Like Abbott and other theists, Lewis knew that in order to persuade others about the existence of a higher, spiritual realm (not to mention miraculous incursions from that realm) he would have to advocate for a universe that was open-ended. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In Madeleine L\u2019Engle\u2019s books such as Wrinkle in Time<\/em>, tesseracts become passageways between worlds\u2014and now there\u2019s a hugely popular movie about it. Her ideas were drawn from the earlier 4D philosphers such as Hinton. White:<\/p>\n

The word \u201ctesseract,\u201d\u009d of course, was Hinton\u2019s term for a hypercube, and in many ways L\u2019Engle continued in the tradition of Hinton enthusiasts deploying this mystical object in order to glimpse higher realities. In Wrinkle<\/em>, Mr. Murray and other government scientists had studied tesseracts and had had some success in creating them. Mr. Murray had \u201ctessered\u201d\u009d through the universe, in fact, landing, unfortunately, on an evil planet where he was now imprisoned. When the Mrs. Ws began their search for Mr. Murray with Meg, Charles Wallace, and Calvin O\u2019Keefe, they explained tessering to them as a folding or wrinkling of spacetime. Mrs. Who lifted the hem of her skirt and stretched it into a straight line. She told the children to imagine an ant traveling along the hem. It would take a long time to travel straight across, but imagine if the path itself could be folded and its two ends brought together? If this were the case, the ant could very quickly travel from one end to the other. Tessering, she said was folding the fabric of spacetime to create new, shorter paths between destinations. When Meg complained that she did not understand, Mrs. Whatsit said that Meg was thinking of space \u201conly in three dimensions,\u201d\u009d and that tessering involved higher levels of spacetime. This led to a lengthy lesson on dimensionality that would have made Hinton proud. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

White has a final chapter discussing various oddly hyperspatial ways to think about contemporary media.<\/p>\n

A sense of mystery surrounded how moving images and information were transmitted invisibly and received by television antennae. In fact when televisual technologies emerged they were understood by many as a type of psychic seeing-at-a-distance. Stefan Andriopoulos has argued that the arrival of the television in Europe in the 1930s was facilitated not just by advances in engineering and physics but also by occult beliefs and practices related to telepathy, telesight, and clairvoyance. The imaginative insight and technical knowledge that made electrical television possible, he has shown, developed in part from \u201coccultist studies on psychic \u201d\u02dcclairvoyance\u2019 (Hellsehen<\/em>) and \u201d\u02dctelevision\u2019 (Fernsehen<\/em>), carried out in the same period by spiritualists who emulated the rules and procedures of science.\u201d\u009d When early electrical televisions brought wireless moving pictures into peoples\u2019 homes many wondered if this was a new way of bringing the \u201csupernatural or marvelous in one\u2019s own living room.\u201d\u009d Televisions were like crystal balls or the magic mirrors of fairy tales. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

So, yeah, Other Worlds<\/em> is a wonderful book. Here’s a photo me with a 72nd birhtday card from my daughter. I feel kind of nostalgic, recommending a young writer’s 4D book. Like I’m passing the baton. One of the first writers on the fourth dimension whom I encountered was the redoubtable Martin Gardner, who ran the “Mathematical Games” column in Scientific American<\/em> all through my youth. He was a great hero of mine and, eventually, my mentor. When he retired from writing his column in 1981, I managed to get a freelance writing gig to interview him<\/a> for a magazine called Science 81<\/em>. And when I told Martin I was working on a book about the fourth dimension, he loaded me down with about a dozen rare old 4D books—on loan. And the next year he wrote a great intro for my book, The Fourth Dimension<\/em>, which I mentioned above. And now it’s Chris White’s turn.<\/p>\n

And so I bid a hail and farewell to all the great 4D thinkers up and down the timeline!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For the last couple of months I\u2019ve been obsessively busy with finishing my novel Return to the Hollow Earth\u2014which I\u2019ll discuss in a different post next week. Re. blogging, what with the rampaging ubiquity of social media, long-form blog posts are slippping in their popularity as a communication format. But there\u2019s no replacement for a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7919","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7919","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7919"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7919\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7931,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7919\/revisions\/7931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}