{"id":6788,"date":"2015-12-13T19:48:48","date_gmt":"2015-12-14T03:48:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/?p=6788"},"modified":"2015-12-14T17:06:00","modified_gmt":"2015-12-15T01:06:00","slug":"rudys-book-picks-for-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/13\/rudys-book-picks-for-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Rudy’s Book Picks for 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

I\u2019ve been seeing various \u201cAuthors Recommend Books\u201d\u009d columns lately, so thought I\u2019d put in my ten cents worth. I\u2019m constantly looking for books these days, ravenous for something to read, and to lose myself in, but over the decades I’ve become fairly picky. Also I\u2019ve already read a lot of the books that I\u2019d want to read\u2026although rereading is a viable option. Anyway, here are some books that I liked this year, listed in on particular order, described in a rapid casual way, and separated by some of my Guanajuato photos. I know I’ve forgotten some books, and I might add more of them later on.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(1) Jonathan Franzen, Purity<\/em>. 2015.
\n<\/b>
\nFranzen went to the same college as me, Swarthmore, but years later, also he lives in the Santa Cruz area a lot of the time. So there\u2019s a natural affinity here. I\u2019ve read all his novels\u2014they\u2019re page-turners with fine lit phrasing and rich, rounded characters who deal with issues somewhat out of the range of normal best-seller concerns. His books are for \u201cus.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n

The title, \u201cPurity,\u201d\u009d is of course off-putting, such an annoying word. But it turns out this is the first name saddled upon our main character by her mother, who is batshit crazy in a vintage-Santa-Cruz-California way. The scenes with Purity’s Mom set my teeth on edge, but they made me laugh too. A lot.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a fat tome of a book, and ranges all over the place, and all of the places it goes are interesting. As a sidelight, Franzen puts in some of the best nature-writing since Kerouac, who also had a way of slipping in great visions of the physical world without any ceremony or hoo-haw. And the ending had me in tears.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(2) Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, Roadside Picnic<\/em>. 1972.
\n<\/b>
\nThis SF novel is legendary among cognoscenti, but somehow I\u2019d never managed to get hold a copy. This year I got it in a new edition and devoured it.<\/p>\n

When people tell me a book is great, I come into it with a certain amount of suspicion and resentment. But from the first page of Roadside Picnic <\/em>I was fully on board. It has a transreal quality in that the characters are ordinary people suffering under a repressive government, just like the Strugatskys themselves. The sci-fi gimmicks are truly original and amazing. It\u2019s very hard to invent things that feel so completely new. But yet it\u2019s all very tactile and easy to understand. Lots of passionate by-play among the characters\u2014they\u2019re anything but cardboard cut-outs. And the ending broke my heart. I like big endings, I think it sucks if a book just tapers off. I need to find another Strugatsky book\u2026<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(3) Thomas Pynchon, Inherent Vice<\/em> and Gravity\u2019s Rainbow<\/em>. 2009 and 1973.
\n<\/b>
\nMy main man. His recent Inherent Vice<\/em> is a lot of fun\u2014kind of Raymond Chandler as stoner novel, with great dollops of paranoia and truly strange characters. It was a shame that this year’s movie version of Inherent Vice <\/em>pretty much ate shit, with the pacing of most of the jokes getting stepped on. In any case I\u2019d watch the movie again, although this time with the subtitles on, as in the film, the pinheaded Joaquin Phoenix \u201ccontinues his campaign to convince movie goers they\u2019re going deaf,\u201d\u009d as one critic put it. Why<\/em>, Joaquin?<\/p>\n

What tends to happen when a new Pynchon book comes out is that I buy it in hardback, devour it, and then feel this salmon-like yen to return to the one true source, the rocky stream where my own writing style was born, the sacred strophes of Gravity\u2019s Rainbow<\/em>. I\u2019ve read it five or six times by now, and each time I find new gems and savor the old ones. Forget Ulysses<\/em>, GR <\/em>was truly the greatest book of the twentieth century. You can learn everything you need to know about everything by reading it with deep inattention. Note that you pretty much won’t understand the book the first time through.\u00a0 You have to read it twice. Note also that it’s broken into little sections and, if you feel like it, you can just hop around and read the sections in random order.\u00a0 There’s a bunch of very short sections with titles, about 2\/3 of the way through, I used to love to read those when I was high, and even now, not high, I love to read them, like the “Listening to the Toilet” section…you can think about that couple of pages for the rest of your life.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(4) Kim Stanley Robinson, 2312<\/em>. 2013.
\n<\/b>
\nI don\u2019t read all of Stan\u2019s books\u2014he can be a little too talky and didactic for my taste. Too straight. But 2312<\/em> is something else. It has the kind of loose, trippy style that appeals to me\u2014the passages about looking at the sun from the planet Mercury are particularly zonkadelic. The idea is that, if you\u2019re directly in <\/em>the sun on Mercury you\u2019re gonna be fried pretty soon, no matter how good a space suit you have. But if you get it right, you can walk along with the ever-east-to-west-moving \u201cterminator,\u201d\u009d that is the shadowy zone where the sun is just about rising, and spend hours or even days staring at the awesome streamers of old Sol. Highly psychedelic, and the toadlike character doing this is a cool guy. He\u2019s not exactly an alien\u2014he\u2019s a gene-modded human. We\u2019ve expanded out across the whole solar system, using hollowed-out asteroids for luxury liner ships, although some of the liners are, just for kicks, left empty and kept completely dark inside during a trip, and people grope around naked and get into some Mongolian clusterfuck situations. Stan narrates all this with heady aplomb.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(5) William Gibson, The Peripheral<\/em>. 2014.
\n<\/b>
\nBill started as the King of Cyberpunk, all those years ago, then went uptown and became hugely successful with engrossing lo-tech novels of intrigue and chicanery. But with The Peripheral<\/em> he\u2019s back in the house, rocking some true SF. He bases his action on kind of time-travel gimmick that manages to circumvent all of the vitiating and irritating paradoxes that come skulking in towards the fire whenever you set out to tell a time-related tall tale.\u00a0 Bill is from the sticks, down in Virginia, and he has a great touch for semi-redneck characters, baffled American detritus, and crazed yokels. He gets a lot of humor from his troupe without at any time being snobby or unkind. He\u2019s one of them. And he always gets you to rooting for his people, it\u2019s great. A stylistic trick I admire in The Peripheral <\/em>is that he uses really short chapters, only a page or two long, piling up hundreds of them to fill out the book. I think he\u2019s onto something in terms of fitting his product to the new American attentions span. A frikkin\u2019 masterpiece.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(6) Douglas Coupland, All Families are Psychotic<\/em>. 2001.
\n<\/b>
\nTwo summers ago I was in Vancouver, Canada, and I wanted to catch up with Bill Gibson, but he was busy finishing The Peripheral <\/em>as it happens, He directed me to a huge art show by the author Douglas Coupland at the main art museum in Vancouver. I enjoyed the show a lot\u2014over the years I\u2019d kind of stopped thinking of Coupland as someone I liked to read, I had this idea that in his more recent books he was repeating himself. But the show really did rock, so I rooted around and found an earlier book of his to read, and came up with this 2001 offering, All Families are Psychotic<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I found this to be one of Coupland greatest novels. He\u2019s just so harsh, and in your face, and relentlessly bad-attitude. No joke too cheap, no scene too gross, go for it. At first the characters in this book\u2019s particular family seem cartoony\u2014but it\u2019s not like any cartoon you ever saw. And, page by page, he builds up rich personalities for them, so that by the end I cared about them, even though on paper their lives are completely stupid and make no sense. Big mooshy happy ending too…about the Space Shuttle, no less. And I laughed a lot along the way.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(7) Richard Kadrey, Sandman Slim Series<\/em>. 2010-2015 (ongoing).
\n<\/b>
\nI\u2019ve known Richard for about thirty years now. He was practically an outsider artist during the late 90s and early 00s, and then he caught on with his novel Sandman Slim<\/em>, and it grew into an amazing series, seven books strong with a couple more in the pipeline. I\u2019ve read most of them. Richard is a very nice and pleasant man\u2014who loves nasty things. And his Sandman Slim <\/em>character Stark is as badass as it gets. Hell, in one of the books he goes down the underworld and takes over for Satan. The basic gimmick of the books is the voice that Richard found for his Stark character. It\u2019s a little like Raymond Chandler\u2019s Phillip Marlowe\u2014the books are, after all, mostly set in LA\u2014but even more wised-up, burnt-out, jaded and\u2014a switch from Marlowe\u2014filled with rage. This series has proved instrumental in kicking off a whole new genre, which is now called urban fantasy. Devils and angles, but in grotty alleys with pimps and drug dealers. Great fun.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(8) Siobhan Roberts, Genius at Play: the Curious Mind of John Horton Conway<\/em>.2015.
\n<\/b>
\nJohn Conway is high-powered Princeton mathematician best known for his work with mathematical games. He was the first to describe the cellular automaton rule known as the Game of Life, which was something of a craze among computer types in the closing years of the 20th century. He also invented a new class of numbers called the Surreal Numbers, which include such lovely quantities as the square root of infinity divided by pi, defined with great logical precision.<\/p>\n

The author of this bio, Siobhan Roberts, seems to have dogged Conway\u2019s steps for nearly five years, and she comes up with a really rich and rounded portrait of the guy, who seems to be a truly memorable weirdo, five sigmas off the norm, not a wholly uncommon type within the math departments of the great universities.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(9) Leonhard Emmerling, Jean-Michel Basquiat<\/em>. 2015.
\n<\/b>
\nI\u2019ve always been intrigued by Basquiat\u2019s art and his legend. I found everything I wanted in this well-written, beautifully illustrated, generously sized, and reasonably priced Taschen book. He\u2019s an odd artist\u2014at times his work looks like he\u2019s hardly doing anything, but then, other times, he gets all the cylinders firing and creates this big overall splash with lots of shapes and images. The images are crudely drawn sometimes, almost like children\u2019s drawings, but it\u2019s in fact hard to draw like children, that was one of Picasso\u2019s skills, so hooray for Basquiat. And it’s good for how messy he makes the paintings.<\/p>\n

Basquiat puts words in his paintings, a practice which I normally frown upon (I never forget Beavis\u2019s and Butthead\u2019s video-judging dictum, \u201cWords suck,\u201d\u009d) but at least he misspells the words and writes them crooked, so maybe they\u2019re okay, they\u2019re kind of acting like brush strokes. I used to be excited about the fact that Jean-Michel collaborated with Andy Warhol on a few works, but in the book it seems like they never really got the mojo going. Never mind, there’s a lot of eye candy in here, and you end up wanting to paint like the guy.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(10) Paul Di Filippo, A Palazzo in The Stars. <\/em>2015.
\n<\/b>
\nPaul Di Filippo writes SF stories, a lot of them, and he\u2019s had a zillion collections come out. I collaborate with him on stories sometimes, so I\u2019m very sensitive to the pleasures of his style. He has this jovial voice and an extreme love of words, with a real knack for SF neologisms. Like one of his stories communication devices is said to be \u201cuebertoothed.\u201d\u009d And there\u2019s a gang of reality hackers called Los Braceros Ultimos. In one of his stories, “Pocketful of Faces,” he gets into an insane riff about people switching their faces, storylet after storylet, topping himself over and over\u2014its\u2019 like watching some mad juggler. And in the denouement, someone is wearing a fake face on top of a fake face on top of their real face, and who even knows why, but it just has to happen. And the doubly buried faces is like a pale grubworm inside a rotten log. Great stuff. Write on, celestial scribe!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

(11) Monica Byrne, The Girl in the Road<\/em>. 2015.
\n<\/b>
\nMonica Byrne\u2019s novel is fine example of a new breed of books. It\u2019s basically science fiction, but it\u2019s marketed into the mainstream as being \u201cspeculative.\u201d\u009d The crossover has to do with the fact that the book is highly literary…in the good sense of being beautifully written. The book involves several women\u2019s points of view, and comes to a truly gnarly and shocking climax, possibly bloodier than anything a man could manage to write.<\/p>\n

In one thread, a woman walks thousands of kilometers along a Mediterranean-spanning structure called the Trail, getting deeper and deeper into strange hallucinations\u2014although maybe everything she sees is real. In another thread, a young girl is journeying across northern Africa on a freight truck. Although it\u2019s a real-world travelogue, the journey had a deeply SF feel, almost like space opera, with a character passing through territories that are wildly unfamiliar. Like travel writing by an alien. Do we have to choose between SF and realistic fiction? Not really. We have the transreal option.<\/p>\n

As Monica Byrne puts it, \u201cWe see breaks in consensus reality all the time, but only some of us choose to register them. I just want to say, \u201d\u02dcHave you been paying attention? Do you know how weird this world is!? Let the strangeness in. It\u2019s real, too.\u2019\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I\u2019ve been seeing various \u201cAuthors Recommend Books\u201d\u009d columns lately, so thought I\u2019d put in my ten cents worth. I\u2019m constantly looking for books these days, ravenous for something to read, and to lose myself in, but over the decades I’ve become fairly picky. Also I\u2019ve already read a lot of the books that I\u2019d want […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6788"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6788\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6810,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6788\/revisions\/6810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}