{"id":508,"date":"2008-05-05T09:33:04","date_gmt":"2008-05-05T17:33:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2008\/05\/05\/voices-in-the-white\/"},"modified":"2008-05-06T20:35:21","modified_gmt":"2008-05-07T04:35:21","slug":"voices-in-the-white","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2008\/05\/05\/voices-in-the-white\/","title":{"rendered":"Voices in the White"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This entry follows on my two previous ones:<br \/>\n<a target=\"blank\" href=\" https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/20\/is-the-universe-infinite\/\">\u201cIs the Universe Infinite?\u201d\u009d<\/a><br \/>\n<a target=\"blank\" href=\" https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/30\/dialog-with-jeff-weeks-on-the-shape-of-space\/\">\u201cDialog on \u201d\u02dcIs the Universe Infinite?\u2019\u201d\u009d<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/jpsayonara.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>I just finished reading a great book, <em><a target=\"blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/0385509642\/ref=nosim\/?tag=rusbl-20\">The Endless Universe <\/a><\/em>.  It\u2019s by these two highly respected physics guys <a target=\"blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.princeton.edu\/~steinh\/\">Paul Steinhardt <\/a>and <a target=\"blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.damtp.cam.ac.uk\/user\/ngt1000\/\">Neil Turok <\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Endless Universe <\/em>argues that the Big Bang \/ Inflationary cosmological scenario has too many kludges to be plausible anymore.  Till reading the book, I hadn\u2019t realized how arbitrary and patched-up the inflationary scenario is by now.  Cosmology is really a mess.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/12cliffbreak.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Steinhardt and Turok propose a simpler scenario called the cyclic universe or the &#8220;ekpyrotic&#8221; (Greek for &#8220;make of fire&#8221;) scenario under which we have two  parallel branes (3d hyperplanes, that is, spaces like the universe), and every trillion years the branes spring together and FLASH all of space is filled with energy, and then the branes move apart, but not very far, only about a Planck length apart.  Then they stop moving apart and hang there for a trillion years. <\/p>\n<p>While hanging there, the branes expand, producing the galactic recession.  The branes are like infinite planes, so they can expand exponentially and always have more room.  And then, after a trillion years, they spring back together.  The space in between them is sometimes known as &#8220;the bulk.&#8221;  Strictly speaking the branes are 9-dimensional, with 3D for space and the 6 extra dimensions for the curled up and verminous Calabi-Yau-manifold stringy subdimensions.  And the bulk dimension in between the branes is the 10th dimension.<\/p>\n<p>There have been, in principle, an infinite number of cycles, that way we don&#8217;t need to face explaining the FIRST one.  Each tortoise stands on the back of a previous tortoise.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/12waterblob.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019d thought the cyclic universe theory had been discredited, but it\u2019s still going strong, and fighting for more air.  The old guard of inflation is fighting hard against the cyclic model, not even taking it very seriously.  <em>The Endless Universe  <\/em> is somewhat tendentious, arguing hard for the cyclic model over and over.  But it convinced me.<\/p>\n<p>Looking on the web, I find there\u2019s a newer Baum-Frampton cyclic model mentioned on <a target=\"blank\" href=\" http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cyclic_Model\">Wikipedia <\/a>.   In this model they talk about a cosmic \u201cBig Rip,\u201d\u009d which was formulated by some other guys in a paper called \u201c<a target=\"blank\" href=\"http:\/\/lanl.arxiv.org\/PS_cache\/astro-ph\/pdf\/0302\/0302506v1.pdf\">Phantom Energy and Cosmic Doomsday<\/a>.\u201d\u009d  The Big Rip is a depressing notion: the idea is that maybe space&#8217;s expansion is accelerating so wildly that eventually the expansion overcomes gravity and the nuclear forces so that first Earth is torn to bits, and then our bodies and even our atoms and the elementary particles.  No, no, I much prefer the Cyclic Univere.  It\u2019s kind of wild these days, how you can find all these far-out science papers online.<\/p>\n<p>One touchy bit in the Steinhardt-Turok model is the odd moment when the branes collide.  To my amateur eye, it seems like it might be nicer and more symmetric if the branes passed through each other instead of bouncing.  By the way, the branes are, strictly speaking orbifolds, whatever that means&#8230;the concept uses some <a target=\"blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Orbifold#Orbifolds_in_string_theory\">insane juicy buzzwords <\/a> like &#8220;quiver diagrams&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/70idiots.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Some bits from <em>The Endless Universe <\/em>that impacted my SF sensors:<\/p>\n<p>(1) In seeming violation of the law of conservation of energy, a universe is allowed to \u201cborrow\u201d\u009d more energy from the gravitational field with each cycle.  Every trillion years, some gravity gets converted into yet more mass and energy\u2014the former mass and energy having been squandered by expansion of the brane space.<\/p>\n<p>(2) Gravity waves are the one thing that might survive from one cycle to the next.  But, methinks there may be other vestiges of the previous cycles that are kicked up (down?) into subtler planes; it helps if, as I like to do, we suppose matter to be infinitely divisible.  Suppose someone can hear these &#8220;voices in the white.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/bk2eyetree.jpg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>(3) They mention that if you have a collapse of space that\u2019s not controlled carefully, you get wild asymmetric oscillations where, like, you turn into a million-mile-long cigar or a sheet of paint the size of the solar system: the chaotic mixmaster scenario.<\/p>\n<p>(4) They really dump on the anthropic principle, which one might present as something like this: \u201cA huge number of possible universes exists, and there just happens to be one that has its constants tuned in just the right way to support fleshapoids on a planet orbiting a sun.\u201d\u009d  I hadn\u2019t realize how desperate and bankrupt the Big Bang\/Inflation model had become.  Supposedly there are scads of inflating universe and we just happen to be in this pariticular just-right one.  It\u2019s much more intellectually satisfying to suppose there\u2019s only one universe and that there are some deep reasons for its properties.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/walterbeach.jpg\"\/><br \/>\n[Note the small profile on the right, my ripple in the Big Flash.]<\/p>\n<p>(5) In either model (inflation or cyclic), it\u2019s been about 14 billion years since the, uh, call it the \u201cBig Flash,\u201d\u009d when space was filled with something like white light (higher energy than light, actually).  The image of that flash gets in the way of seeing more than 14 billion light years away.  But in the cyclic model, the space is in fact endless, and there\u2019s lots of galaxies out past the 14 billion light year haze.  I\u2019m supposing (SFictionally speaking) that we can see past the haze via (a) faint gravity waves or (b) subtle energies relating to the as yet unknown subtler levels of matter.  Supposedly we have another trillion years to go before the collapse, before the Big Splat that produces the next Big Flash. <\/p>\n<p>(6) During the initial phase right after the Big Flash, a ripple that\u2019s only a few meters across can in fact serve as the seed for a galaxy.  Hmm&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/images\/amjoey2.jpg\"\/><br \/>\n[Adult ripple becomes Joey Ramone \/ T. Rex]<\/p>\n<p>I might write a story about all this: \u201cVoices in the White.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This entry follows on my two previous ones: \u201cIs the Universe Infinite?\u201d\u009d \u201cDialog on \u201d\u02dcIs the Universe Infinite?\u2019\u201d\u009d I just finished reading a great book, The Endless Universe . It\u2019s by these two highly respected physics guys Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok . The Endless Universe argues that the Big Bang \/ Inflationary cosmological scenario [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}