{"id":2276,"date":"2010-05-13T23:14:49","date_gmt":"2010-05-14T07:14:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/?p=2276"},"modified":"2010-05-14T15:49:26","modified_gmt":"2010-05-14T23:49:26","slug":"sf-and-quantum-mechanics-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/2010\/05\/13\/sf-and-quantum-mechanics-2\/","title":{"rendered":"SF and Quantum Mechanics, #2"},"content":{"rendered":"

About ten days ago, on May 3, 2010, I did a post, \u201cSF and Quantum Mechanics #1,\u201d\u009d <\/a>and today\u2019s post is the follow-up. Although there really are a zillion things one might talk about in this context, in these two posts I\u2019m focusing on six areas. I went into (1) \u201d\u201c (3) in my SF & QM #1 post, and in the fairly extensive and interactive comments\u2014these discussions involved possible SF stories involving (1) the Planck length, (2) many universes, and (3) superposed states. And now, in \u201cSF & QM #2,\u201d\u009d I\u2019ll tackle topics (4)-(6).<\/p>\n


\n[Slime is health. A ditch near Alviso, CA.] <\/em><\/p>\n

So onward with my ramshackle QM rap. Harrumph<\/em>. Today we\u2019ll address these topics:<\/p>\n

(4) The Secret Theory. <\/b> Can there be hidden variables and a deterministic theory at a deeper level than QM?
\n(5) QM Teep. <\/b>The QM notion of entanglement says that distant particles\u2019 states are in some instantaneous way correlated.
\n(6) Everything’s Alive. <\/b>Quantum computation indicates that any piece of matter can be regarded as a supercomputer, potentially capable of carrying out intelligent-seeming computations.<\/p>\n


\n[My sage friend Gunnar and a relativistic train.]<\/em><\/p>\n

(4) The Secret Theory. <\/b><\/p>\n

To some of us it seems annoying that QM only gives a probabilistic prediction of what happens when you measure some given quantity. We\u2019d like to think that there might be some so-called hidden variables at a deeper level, and a richer theory involving these hidden variable which would in fact give completely accurate and deterministic predictions.<\/p>\n

QM has several defenses against this hope, in particular the celebrated experimental work involving \u201cBell\u2019s Theorem<\/a>,\u201d\u009d seems to show that no theory of local <\/em>hidden variables can correctly match up with the observed results of quantum mechanics.<\/p>\n

One way out is to assume there is some kind of global, all-pervasive set of \u201chidden\u201d\u009d or underlying variables. As I put it in a post back in December 10, 2004, \u201cWhat is Reality? Two CAs,\u201d\u009d <\/a>, it is <\/em>possible to have \u201ca deterministic universe despite the wifty, come-drink-the-Kool-Aid mystery-mongering of quantum mechanics.\u201d\u009d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

You must have to suppose that there is an underlying reality which is utterly deterministic both forwards and backwards in time. The scientist Stephen Wolfram had, for a time, some hope of finding the underlying final theory for such a world. His hope that the theory might be something rather simple, a bit like time-reversible cellular automaton rule. The tricky part is finding (a) the rule and (b) at least one complete \u201cNow\u201d\u009d to use as the seed for running forward and backwards. Everything has to be just right.<\/p>\n

Although Wolfram seems now to have turned to other things, I don\u2019t find his quest unreasonable. In thinking along these lines, I\u2019m inspired by John Cramer\u2019s\u201cThe Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics<\/a>\u201d\u009d. In Cramer\u2019s physics, the future influences our present every bit as much as does the past. Synchronicity is not an illusion, events really are very tightly knit together.<\/p>\n


\n[The only known recording of the large-scale movements of the earth during the Great Quake in San Francisco, 1906, on display at the Mt. Hamilton Observatory near San Jose, CA.]<\/em><\/p>\n

In some sense a spacetime like Cramer\u2019s needs to be crafted all at once, and from a vantage point wholly outside of space and time. I sometimes like to interpret Cramer\u2019s theory as meaning that our universe is patterned like a novel, with synchronistic and meaningful correspondences built in. These correspondences establish themselves not by cause-and-effect, from outside of time, from the Pen of the some Author (or Process). Here\u2019s a link to my passage discussing this notion in an online section of my tome, The Lifebox, The Seashell and the Soul<\/a>.<\/p>\n

On the way to creating a properly novelistic universe, a Creator might go through a number of drafts, as I mentioned in my earlier \u201cSF & QM #1\u201d\u009d post connection with the notions of multiple universes, and my novel Mathematicians in Love.<\/em> But it\u2019s just as \u201clikely\u201d\u009d to suppose he\/she\/it\/they\/we managed to get it right on the first try. If something\u2019s impossibly difficult, doing a few warm-ups isn\u2019t necessarily going to get you all that much closer to success.<\/p>\n

A completely different approach to a hidden variables theory is to suppose that there are particles below the Planck length or, even better, to suppose that matter is indeed infinitely divisible. In the “SF & QM, #1” post, I mentioned my online story “Jack and the Aktuals<\/a>,” in which the characters find a transfinite world universe of “hidden variables” down beneath the Planck length, with ever-smaller size scales to explore.<\/p>\n


\n[Quantum foam washes up on the shores of the salty ponds in the SF Bay just north of the San Ho airport.]<\/p>\n

(5) QM Teep. <\/b>
\nWhether or not we believe QM to be a final theory, we seem to be stuck with the fact that the states of distant objects are entangled with each other\u2014particularly if the two objects in question have ever spent any quality time together. And, hey, if the superdense yobbity-yob seventeen-septillion-clowns-in-one-VW moments of the early universe aren\u2019t quality time, then what is?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Everything affects everything else! But, as usual, science hastens to throw on cold water\u2014in this case by saying that you can\u2019t use entanglement to send messages. But why should SF writers worry about that kind of buzz-kill? We can always find a work-around. In my story, \u201cPanpsychism Proved<\/a>,\u201d\u009d now online, I used some special kind of quantum dots to promote telepathy, which I often call teep<\/em>.<\/p>\n

In general, I might suppose that I can use quantum entanglement to read a distant friend\u2019s mind because, after all, we two have broken bread together. Left to their own devices, our minds fuzz out and become uncertain, but when one of decides something then, given that we\u2019re entangled, the other one decides the same thing too.<\/p>\n


\n[A Mandelbrot set inside the Rudy Set, you can find it by zooming into the RudyRockets <\/a>image.]<\/p>\n

Turns out this move is too much of a clich\u00c3\u00a9 to work in SF today. The people who seriously use quantum entanglement as an explanation for psychic phenomena tend to be working a commercial New Age vein. There\u2019s this phenomenon called \u201cdecoherence\u201d\u009d that tends to screw up your quantum-entangled connection to your pals. So it\u2019s probably wiser for an SF writer to get telepathy, telekinesis, and teleportation by some other means than by entanglement—unless you\u2019re simply out for a lark, or a short-short smash-and-grab.<\/p>\n

I most recently used a quite different explanation for telepathy in my novel Postsingular<\/em>. Here the world has a \u201cparanormal branespace topology<\/em>\u201d\u009d, meaning that one of the normally rolled-up \u201cvermin dimension,\u201d\u009d the eighth dimension in fact, is unrolled, and everyone can think out along it to an attainable point at infinity which serves a global telepathy server. You can read this passage of Postsingular <\/em>online here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Ph. D. means \u201cpiled high and deep.\u201d\u009d Let\u2019s kill this sixer.<\/p>\n


\n[Prof. Rucker with a dried cowpie near Mount Hamilton, east of San Jose.]<\/em><\/p>\n

(6) Everything’s Alive. <\/b>
\nAs a fuddy-duddy computer science professor, I used to resist the notion of quantum computation. It sounded so flaky\u2014and may well be hamstrung by the decoherence issue. This said, I eventually came around. As an SF writer, I can\u2019t afford to turn my back on a technology that can turn ordinary matter into an inconceivably powerful computer.<\/p>\n

The line that pushed me into the quantum computation camp was when I read a remark that whenever you shine light on something it\u2019s doing a quantum computation. How cool is that?<\/p>\n

In a post called \u201cBreaking the Bank of Computation<\/a>,\u201d\u009d on September 21, 2009, I got into it and did a back-of-a-matchbook calculation of just how much computation our universe might do for us, running flat out as a quantum computer. You\u2019d get maybe 10-to-the-229th-power operations per second. A little less than a googol cubed.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The tricky bit of course is figuring out how to program raw matter. As I argued in my \u201cFundamental Limits to Virtual Reality<\/a>\u201d\u009d post on March 3, 2008, there\u2019s really no reason to disassemble our friendly ordinary matter and turn it into some spurious stuff called \u201ccomputronium.\u201d\u009d Regular matter can compute fine just as it is.<\/p>\n

But the input\/output is an issue. And this is worth thinking about in SF. In my novels Postsingular <\/em>and Hylozoic<\/em>, I went ahead and had ordinary objects carrying out autonomous, emerging, evolving mind-like computations. And, just to get the novel written, I assumed that we\u2019d talk to our wise doo-dads via telepathy. I gave some talks on this under the name \u201cPsipunk<\/a>,\u201d\u009d the last time I was in Japan.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Cast off the chains of QM dogma and crank it up! We\u2019ve barely started\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

About ten days ago, on May 3, 2010, I did a post, \u201cSF and Quantum Mechanics #1,\u201d\u009d and today\u2019s post is the follow-up. Although there really are a zillion things one might talk about in this context, in these two posts I\u2019m focusing on six areas. I went into (1) \u201d\u201c (3) in my SF […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2276"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2289,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2276\/revisions\/2289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rudyrucker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}