<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QC, SJ, Maker Faire, Las Hormigas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2007/05/21/415/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2007/05/21/415/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2007/05/21/415/#comment-9557</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2007/05/21/415/#comment-9557</guid>
		<description>Nice cover - some major power chords there: motorcycle, giant ants, great big red rocks, but isn't an SF mag cover supposed to have half-naked women? 

I've been trying to find an online image of something I saw once in a book - an old pioneer had carved wooden candlesticks in such a way that at the right angle they cast shadows of female figures, although the candlesticks seemed round. A little company out on the range. Wonder if you could bake pottery to do that kind of thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice cover - some major power chords there: motorcycle, giant ants, great big red rocks, but isn&#8217;t an SF mag cover supposed to have half-naked women? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to find an online image of something I saw once in a book - an old pioneer had carved wooden candlesticks in such a way that at the right angle they cast shadows of female figures, although the candlesticks seemed round. A little company out on the range. Wonder if you could bake pottery to do that kind of thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pekka</title>
		<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2007/05/21/415/#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>Pekka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 07:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2007/05/21/415/#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>Consciousness becomes science: http://www.sbg.ac.at/brain2007/ and http://www.tsc2007.org/

I've been re-reading Nick Herbert's Quantum Reality and now I understood it this way: Quantum Theory is a standardized programming interface, that allows to develop 3D objects in atomic dimensions. In a way, it is similar to DNA/Ribosome Compiler, that allows any kind of compound layers to be developed that are based on Quantum Theory objects.

What's beyond Quatum Theory Programming Language is like studying Java Programming Language without any knowledge on computers, or humans using computers ... sort of problematics :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consciousness becomes science: <a href="http://www.sbg.ac.at/brain2007/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sbg.ac.at/brain2007/</a> and <a href="http://www.tsc2007.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tsc2007.org/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been re-reading Nick Herbert&#8217;s Quantum Reality and now I understood it this way: Quantum Theory is a standardized programming interface, that allows to develop 3D objects in atomic dimensions. In a way, it is similar to DNA/Ribosome Compiler, that allows any kind of compound layers to be developed that are based on Quantum Theory objects.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s beyond Quatum Theory Programming Language is like studying Java Programming Language without any knowledge on computers, or humans using computers &#8230; sort of problematics <img src='http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
