Now that I have caught up, right I should be working but I was reading you blog instead, I see that you ideas about how teleportation already takes care of my concerns. in your model it would seem that ordinary objects would seldom or never teleport just because they were not “interested.” It might be interesting to have ordinary objects occasionally get side tracked from “here and now” and wind up somewhere else. Random teleportation. A person might cause an apple to teleport by planting the idea of another place. It would work most of the time, but sometimes the objects would wind up some place unexpected.

Solution: resubscribe. Go to my RSS Feed link:
http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/?feed=rss2

If you’re using Firefox 2, Internet Explorer 7, or any other modern browser, you’ll see a dialog that asks if you want to subscribe to the feed, and you’ll have a choice of which reader to use.

I think you need a good physics reason for limiting teleportation — higgs particle interaction, is somehow different based on some quality of memory. It should be related to what stops teleportation now. Perhaps Houdini knew this secret.

Although every day in the lab for me is essentially a “bad hair day,” I am presently working on speculative research linking possible teleportation and sneezing…. I am somehow convinced that sniffing certain detergents can be a profound and dramatic window to the observation of this possible “link.” Can you offer any suggestions? —- Dr. Quackenbush [aka linus]

Well, why not?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkg1Gngpdog