<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview: Cyberpunk, What is SF, Robots, How I Write.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2005/11/21/interview-cyberpunk-what-is-sf-robots-how-i-write/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2005/11/21/interview-cyberpunk-what-is-sf-robots-how-i-write/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=interview-cyberpunk-what-is-sf-robots-how-i-write</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred the Dancing Bug</title>
		<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2005/11/21/interview-cyberpunk-what-is-sf-robots-how-i-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6816</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred the Dancing Bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudyrucker.com/wordpress/?p=154#comment-6816</guid>
		<description>&quot;let&#8217;s start with a particularly evil-looking photo of El Chimp. I mean is this scary and retro and Orwellian, or what?&quot;
Umm. No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;let&rsquo;s start with a particularly evil-looking photo of El Chimp. I mean is this scary and retro and Orwellian, or what?&#8221;<br />
Umm. No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2005/11/21/interview-cyberpunk-what-is-sf-robots-how-i-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6815</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudyrucker.com/wordpress/?p=154#comment-6815</guid>
		<description>Rudy, if a lifebox had good software, would it be able to write more Rucker books? You know you&#039;ve probably got fifty more book ideas imbedded in your musings just on this blog. If the box could carry out these intentions, modifying sentences to explain the idea, it would be on the road to a kind of AI.... Rudy Racter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy, if a lifebox had good software, would it be able to write more Rucker books? You know you&#8217;ve probably got fifty more book ideas imbedded in your musings just on this blog. If the box could carry out these intentions, modifying sentences to explain the idea, it would be on the road to a kind of AI&#8230;. Rudy Racter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2005/11/21/interview-cyberpunk-what-is-sf-robots-how-i-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6814</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudyrucker.com/wordpress/?p=154#comment-6814</guid>
		<description>
First, thank you for &quot;A Writer&#039;s Toolkit&quot;.
It reminds me of &quot;Code Complete&quot; or &quot;The Pragmatic Programmer&quot; because of how it shows the nuts and bolts of the process.
Fyi, I think there&#039;s an error on page 11:
----
For now instead of an (A-&gt;B) scene, you now have (A-&gt;C) and (C-&gt;A).
----
Should be:
----
For now instead of an (A-&gt;B) scene, you now have (A-&gt;C) and (C-&gt;B).
----
Thanks again for the knowledge!
Hard gotten, generously given, much appreciated.
karl
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, thank you for &#8220;A Writer&#8217;s Toolkit&#8221;.<br />
It reminds me of &#8220;Code Complete&#8221; or &#8220;The Pragmatic Programmer&#8221; because of how it shows the nuts and bolts of the process.<br />
Fyi, I think there&#8217;s an error on page 11:<br />
&#8212;-<br />
For now instead of an (A->B) scene, you now have (A->C) and (C->A).<br />
&#8212;-<br />
Should be:<br />
&#8212;-<br />
For now instead of an (A->B) scene, you now have (A->C) and (C->B).<br />
&#8212;-<br />
Thanks again for the knowledge!<br />
Hard gotten, generously given, much appreciated.<br />
karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

